Mexico Night #2 ORIGINAL Livemet MP3's
-
- Killing Time
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:16 pm
Mexico Night #2 ORIGINAL Livemet MP3's
Can anyone please upload the orinal 128 kb/s MP3s of that show from livemet? I only collect the files coming originally from livemet, and all so far upped shows have been mp3's converted from flacs. Would be really thankful if anybody could do that!
"Music should just be SHARED" (Joss Stone)
- damageinc
- Metallica Taper
- Posts: 2559
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 2:45 pm
- Location: Your mother's backyard barbecue
- Contact:
Re: Mexico Night #2 ORIGINAL Livemet MP3's
Why don't you just convert to 128 kbps? It's all the same what they do at livemetallica.
-
- Killing Time
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:16 pm
Re: Mexico Night #2 ORIGINAL Livemet MP3's
Yeah, but i want the files originally coming from livemet..i'm a freak
"Music should just be SHARED" (Joss Stone)
- James Spaceman
- Bad Seed
- Posts: 1363
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 1:11 am
Re: Mexico Night #2 ORIGINAL Livemet MP3's
WTF? Then buy them.
-
- Killing Time
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:16 pm
Re: Mexico Night #2 ORIGINAL Livemet MP3's
c'mon, every show from this tour so far has been uploaded in the original 128 kb/s version from livemet..why not this one? And if you have nothing nice to say about a request then stay the fuck outta here dude.
"Music should just be SHARED" (Joss Stone)
- James Spaceman
- Bad Seed
- Posts: 1363
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 1:11 am
Re: Mexico Night #2 ORIGINAL Livemet MP3's
^ Dude fuck off, man I'm done with your psycho bullshit. What the hell is your problem?
- damageinc
- Metallica Taper
- Posts: 2559
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 2:45 pm
- Location: Your mother's backyard barbecue
- Contact:
Re: Mexico Night #2 ORIGINAL Livemet MP3's
Andi, I highly doubt that anybody will buy and upload the ORIGINAL mp3 version, since the flac rip is already available here.
- HorstKirk PageKian
- Helpless
- Posts: 1794
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:02 pm
- Location: Berlin, Germany
- Contact:
Re: Mexico Night #2 ORIGINAL Livemet MP3's
well, you can't say "original" anyway. they would be "original" if you actually bought them from livemetallica. what is wrong with a FLAC-conversion?
- antonioshakur
- Damage Inc.
- Posts: 508
- Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 1:16 pm
- Location: Monterrey
- Contact:
Re: Mexico Night #2 ORIGINAL Livemet MP3's
is better the FLAC-conversion.
- Limp
- Damage Case
- Posts: 3996
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 4:33 am
- Location: Sweden
Re: Mexico Night #2 ORIGINAL Livemet MP3's
The difference is that the LiveMet 128 kbit/s CBR Mp3s are converted from their own original WAV-files (which I think is the source) rather than from FLAC. But that doesn't matter since the FLACs doesn't have any lost information whatsoever and actually IS those original WAV-files packed into FLAC.
ID-tags, bitrate, stereo-settings: everything can be remodelled to be EXACTLY as the original LiveMet mp3s. It's just overkill to get it straight from there when the show already exists. If Blasphemer (for example) feel the need to buy the mp3s then it's nothing to it, and all respect to him for doing so and uploading it here, etc, etc...
But to think that the "original" LiveMet mp3s could be BETTER in any way is just bullshit. Remember that they have fucked up their conversions before and people have payed for it.
And either way, you can convert 192 kbit/s mp3s to a bitrate of 128 without hurting the files at all. So what's the problem?
ID-tags, bitrate, stereo-settings: everything can be remodelled to be EXACTLY as the original LiveMet mp3s. It's just overkill to get it straight from there when the show already exists. If Blasphemer (for example) feel the need to buy the mp3s then it's nothing to it, and all respect to him for doing so and uploading it here, etc, etc...
But to think that the "original" LiveMet mp3s could be BETTER in any way is just bullshit. Remember that they have fucked up their conversions before and people have payed for it.
And either way, you can convert 192 kbit/s mp3s to a bitrate of 128 without hurting the files at all. So what's the problem?